It's all those other limits - not the number of pixels - that will restrict what you can do with the camera. If you're only going to shoot the family and you're willing to accept the limits of shooting video with a still camera, then the difference between 7s is irrelevant. Even if it is, however, it is usually limited by issues such as lack of ability to zoom or focus while shooting, lack of ability to plug in an external mike and other functions that are standard on all but the cheapest camcorders. It's generally not the quality that you would get from a camcorder. Video from a compact digital camera is very good in the sense that it's amazing that a camera that small and inexpensive can record video at all. Even better: Cut short and direct me to reliable sites that discuss these issues in a language suitable for an HD beginner. What kind of advantages and disadvantages will I experience? Am I better served to wait for compacts to feature 1080p? Will they?Please reply in a manner that corresponds to my limited scope and experience. So I am now looking at units like Panasonic's Lumix DMC-ZS3 and Canon's new range of HD-enabled ELPHs. It's bulky, meaning that it's not there when I need it. Rather, I want to learn from more experienced people what a pocketable digital camera can and cannot do whether it will be good enough to be the one solution for family documentation and whether its movie files will "last" even as displays and screens move on to higher resolutions.I have used an old-style non-HD miniDV (PAL) camcorder since 2004 but I've never been really fond of it. I have no intention of getting a "real" video camera so I don't need gear advice. I know my way around a DSLR quite well but I am a complete novice as far as HD video recording is concerned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |